|
|
|
|
|
by talon88
4727 days ago
|
|
I find the drip-feed of information a really interesting choice, though I'm curious of its efficacy versus the wikileaks style dump. It keeps the news alive for a longer period of time, sure, but it also means fewer eyes are looking over it and connecting the dots between various different pieces of the revealed information. Wouldn't it be better if everything was revealed at once, and the various investigative reporters out there all got to go through it independently and write up a cohesive summation of the results, instead of this two-three page exposé per day? |
|
If you're dealing with a criminal, having a slight upper hand in information while playing it as though you know everything is a proven tool. Like a police interview where an accused gets presented with a crime so you can watch him or her come up with an excuse, which, in turn, might reveal information that you didn't even know before.
In fact, one minister in Germany made a pretty grave statement about how the US behavior was "monstrous". So now I'm kind of waiting for the Snowden story to get to the part where things about Germany are revealed.
[0]It seems like they did the opposite, as they usually do, doubling down in 'Merica adoration. Which is still similarly funny.