Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vy8vWJlco 4728 days ago
I'm sorry - I used "accepted" when I should have used "chosen," since self-determination was implicitly my end. With that in mind: eagerness does not mean you had a choice (though perhaps that's unimportant to you).

There is only a choice if the alternative was actually an option. When the government can force you to eat cake, it hardly matters if you may have enjoyed that first piece. What matters is that you will be eating it one way or another. (That is not what I would call "establishing a free market" - that's not even a free lunch.)
1 comments
saraid216 4728 days ago
I agree that there was no choice.

So what? I don't have a problem with that.

I recognize that not having a choice is scary, but I find it foolish to base a worldview off fear.

Justify the need for choice, please.

link
vy8vWJlco 4727 days ago
"..., and the pursuit of happiness."

If not having choice is scary (your word), which I would say is a synonym for "undesirable", I cannot be said to have the right to pursue happiness without it (choice).

> "I find it foolish to base a worldview off fear."

The only sense in which I'm basing my worldview "off of" fear is by asserting the right not to live in it. (In that sense, I am also basing my worldview off of starvation - as I am eating breakfast.)

link
saraid216 4727 days ago
...is your claim really going to come down to, "Taxes make me unhappy"? Because that's what I'm seeing:

"Taxes are either an incentive or a threat." -> "Taxes are a threat because I did not choose them." -> "Taxes stymie my pursuit of happiness."

link