[jon2512chua]

Interesting read.

Though correct me if I'm wrong, but I find the article rather biased against iterative/agile way of writing software. Don't get me wrong, I believe there's a time and place for over-2500-pages-of-specs-for-6000-LoC kinda process, but the article seems to be saying that quick iterations are of the stone age/how little children do it and that the way the on-board shuttle group software team wrote their software is the "perfect" way.

[taspeotis]

It's been a while since I've read the article, but I skimmed over it and didn't really get that vibe from it.

I felt it was more "these guys are extreme outliers in terms of software quality, but also extreme outliers in terms of process."