|
|
|
|
|
by epistasis
4729 days ago
|
|
> members of the armed forces would be centi-millionaires. I don't mean to dispute, but I don't understand this. I had thought that it was impossible that the US' military could be worth the $682 billion per year the US spends on it, that it was a sinecure for contractors. At >1.4 million active personnel, you're talking a value of hundreds of trillions, at least 10x the US GDP. The military is only useful as a threat deterrent and threat defense, what threat could possibly justify that? |
|
I guess the moral is that people shouldn't try to be cute when using metric prefixes.