[saryant]

> From a "hacker" perspective, even metadata on the key employees of a corporation is incredibly valuable -- imagine knowing with what firms a company is communicating, giving inside lines of investment-impacting activities like acquisitions. This is enormously valuable stuff.

When Boeing and McDonnell Douglas merged, executives from those companies would fly to different, distinct cities for negotiations and then drive several hours to the actual meeting location. In that case, just knowing that execs from those two firms were flying to the same city repeatedly would be more than enough to start merger rumors.

IIRC, ExxonMobil did the same when acquiring XTO. Exxon didn't want XTO's share price to skyrocket on rumors of an acquisition as it could've made the deal unprofitable.

[gohrt]

> IIRC, ExxonMobil did the same when acquiring XTO. Exxon didn't want XTO's share price to skyrocket on rumors of an acquisition as it could've made the deal unprofitable.

That doesn't make sense. If shares rose on the merger rumor, Exxon could still offer a low price, since everyone knew XTO's price would collapse if the merge fell through.

[yardie]

During an acquisition the price on the shares of the acquirer goes down while the acquiree goes up. Since most mergers tend to be stock swaps rather than cash they would have to invest more shares than originally intended. If the merger falls through both would lose out as the acquirer would be seen as wasting a lot of money with nothing to show and the acquiree would be see as not so valuable.

[dllthomas]

They could still, in principle, negotiate around fixed numbers of shares instead of market values.

[saryant]

XOM initiated a very aggressive share buyback program ~15 years ago, their own treasury is one of their largest shareholders.

Makes much more sense for them to use those shares in acquisitions in the form of a stock swap.