[viraptor]

If it's real. ...chan boards are the home of (sometimes very elaborate) trolls. Additionally: 22:52 "I'm gonna download q3a", 23:09 description of the game. Yet it took >20min to get a screenshot later.

I don't buy the "not moving" part either. If they were using NN, then there's no reason they'd include / train connections to scores - only to current environment. NN with any kind of randomisation added between games (to get out of local maxs) would not stand still either.

TL;DR - screenshot is not a proof, ...chan boards are not reliable news services.

[jacques_chester]

It'd depend on the function you use to measure error, wouldn't it?

Computational intelligence / nature inspired computing tends first of all to reveal flaws in the problem statement.