[Yoric]

> 1) Only to other Firefox OS phones that support the same WebAPIs that your apps require. Mozilla is working hard to push those APIs through W3C and encourage others to implement them. But that is a slow process and it remains to be seen if the other players want to do that.

In theory, it will work anywhere, eventually. But today, almost every single FirefoxOS applications can run unchanged on Android (using Firefox for Android). Most of them can also work on laptop/desktop (using regular Firefox). That's already way better than whatever Android or iOS offer.

> 2) Only if those applications are completely standalone and do not depend on server side components. Developer goes out of business or loses interest in the app? Good luck reverse engineering minified JavaScript or reimplementing a backend that the app depended on.

On this point, I agree with you. The parent post was overpromising.

> Firefox OS is great and it is a long term plan. But to claim it solves all problems we have now with mobile software goes too far in my opinion. Those same problems will just exist on any new platform.

I, for one, don't claim that. But I am convinced that Firefox OS is a great step forward, and that's all we can ask, really.

Caveat: I am a Mozillian.

[embolism]

This is all true, but it's too late. The open source community (and HN) proclaimed Android as open for years, and frankly shouted down anyone who suggested otherwise as an iOS apologist (which clearly some of them were),

People believe they are getting something free and open when they buy Android.

These fine distinctions aren't going to make a difference in anyone's mind since the Geek vote already went to Android.

[Ygg2]

Really?! The gist was that Android was more like eventually open, because real development lags behind the OSS version?

[embolism]

Are you seriously trying to pretend that general consensus on Android wasn't 'it's better than iOS because it's open'?

Now that wolf has been cried, it's too late.

[Ygg2]

I'm not pretending anything. Both of those statements are true. Android is more open than iOS, FxOS is more open than Android.

And in every Android topic there is at least one commenter saying that Android isn't truly open.

[embolism]

That one commenter is usually drowned out to the point that the desire for 'open' is believed to be satisfied by Android. Now that a real open alternative comes along, it's too late.

[Ygg2]

We'll see I guess.