|
|
|
|
|
|
by gyardley
4737 days ago
|
|
|
Culture is a big part of it, yes, but often 'nation' does include aspects of ethnicity. Like I said, the term is complex. Nationalism is something people seem to naturally do. Whether it has a 'point' or not in 2013 is pretty irrelevant - if people are doing it anyway, it's important to try and understand it. While nationalism certainly does distinguish people, it doesn't follow that it dehumanizes others. Having a 'love of country' is perfectly compatible with recognizing the humanity of those not in it. As for your last question, of course not. I'm a little curious why you asked me that. Do you think I'm some sort of racist for trying to explain a concept to you that's prevalent across the globe? |
|
|
Google defines ethnicity as: The fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Sounds a bit circular.
> Nationalism is something people seem to naturally do.
Nationalism is something you do? How does one nationalism?
> Whether it has a 'point' or not in 2013 is pretty irrelevant - if people are doing it anyway, it's important to try and understand it
Based on what I've gathered, nationalism is a way to arbitrarily distinguish your culture from another in hopes of inevitably forming a border with your neighbor in order to enact a national government?
> Do you think I'm some sort of racist for trying to explain a concept to you that's prevalent across the globe?
Not one bit. I understand the notion is prevalent, but I wonder if we would be better off without it. Similar to racism, it's prevalent and we would be better off without it. I do feel that many arguments in favor of national pride work in favor of racial pride as well -- which is why I brought it up.