Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ams6110 4739 days ago
Seems to use the psychological technique of intermittent rewards to encourage continued clicking of "stoke the fire." Unfortunately after about 4 stokings with no new developments in the game, I got bored and quit.
7 comments

Too bad. I am now headman of a large village because I kept stoking. Series A financing can't be far behind!
In this and candy box you're not really supposed to pay attention to the window for the first couple minutes. There is literally nothing to do.

Then later once you're maybe 10 minutes in you can switch away for extended times if you want to wait for the continuous income, no need to press buttons, no 'intermittent rewards'.

It could be changed but it's not actually depending on any kind of psychological tricks. The delays are just a minor throttle at the start.

Edit: Actually, to be precise, you only have to stoke the fire once. It's just a deliberately paced cutscene. No psychology there.

> In this and candy box you're not really supposed to pay attention to the window for the first couple minutes. There is literally nothing to do.

Yeah, interesting call, that. When I played Candybox, I was told "before you dismiss So what it, wait until you get 60 candies, then shit gets real".

So, what does a self-respecting hacker do, when faced with 60 seconds of "literally nothing to do" ... except the challenge of opening the JS Console to see if I can make that counter run faster, preferably in less than 60 seconds? ;-)

(answer: yes, it was in fact fairly easy)

I was about to do that. But then the stranger awakened, and then, the game becomes far more interesting.
It takes a while to get warmer, and then more interesting things happen ;)
After two times stoking the fire the room changes from cold to mild. There is also a shivering stranger stumbling into the room. Of course you can still be bored by that, but it is not true, that there is no new development.
As opposed to the psychological technique of continuous rewards, or never rewarding something (both of which are also boring)?
Intermittent rewards actually work best to encourage a conditioned behavior.

http://www.indiana.edu/~p1013447/dictionary/sked.htm

Edit: I got bored quickly anyway, probably because I just don't find computer games to be a satisfying way to spend time. Never have.

I had the same effect although the others seem to disagree...