|
|
|
|
|
|
by rlpb
4735 days ago
|
|
|
> If we get people to widely use GPG to encrypt the content of their emails, that is already a huge win. Sure. Completely agree. > (and I'm not entirely sure if those key-ID's are sufficiently unique and/or secure, but you can put more then just the ID in such a header to fix that) Note that a key ID is just the last characters of the fingerprint. If you want a more secure key ID, just use a longer piece of the fingerprint (which is a valid longer form of key ID that gpg will Just Work with). |
|
|
cool, I was hoping it would work something like that :)