|
|
|
|
|
|
by alok-g
4736 days ago
|
|
|
AFAIK, people skilled in prior art are often called into courts in order to arrive at the decision. >> the result would be dramatically anti-software patent compared to While I am still trying to understand what you mean, I do not yet see a connection of this to the anti-software patents view. |
|
|
Well, yes, but they're typically experts from both sides whose goal is to promote their side's case, not accurately inform the jury. That's different from a jury having a direct understanding of the practitioners point-of-view.
> While I am still trying to understand what you mean, I do not yet see a connection of this to the anti-software patents view.
I'm saying that actual practitioners are likely (and, in my view, correctly) to see more things as obvious, fewer things as novel and so on than a layperson or a patent lawyer. The impact on patent lawsuits should be obvious.