I'm talking about the current incarnation which makes the most sense to me anyway. I know there were different versions but I like the current version the best. And it's clearly the most "liberal" in language.
The only differences between the current pledge and the pledge as it was many decades ago are superficial. Changing the salute and adding the (problematic for other reasons) reference to a god serve to change the appearance of the pledge, but not its substance. It remains as nationalistic as ever.
(Also, the addition of the words "under god" and a reference to a particular government hardly make it more "liberal"?)
(Also, the addition of the words "under god" and a reference to a particular government hardly make it more "liberal"?)