[fnordfnordfnord]

>It's whether the action has the effect of prejudicing the United States or benefiting a foreign government regardless of intent.

I wonder if there is a precedent supporting successful use of that charge. That's very broad wording. Taken literally, nearly anything you say that isn't puppies and rainbows could qualify.

[eli]

Nearly anything you say about a classified intelligence program to unauthorized people, you mean. Yeah, I think that's the point :)

[fnordfnordfnord]

Can't you see the Kafka-esque nature of such a condition?