Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by spitx 4739 days ago
Let's not get cute here.

If the United States wanted him extracted (on the way to Hong Kong) or worse, killed during his sojourn in HK, Snowden would have already faced a fate several orders worse than Alexander V. Litvinenko.

It isn't a huge tab for the U.S. to foot in the way of deploying deep cover teams to "take care" of Snowden - for what had been alleged to be the biggest U.S. intelligence leak in a generation - in the least suspicion-arousing manner long before Greenwald ever published his story.

For a nation that outspends the next ten defense budgets combined (even with the off late sequestration cuts accounted for) this is not much of a task.

The top brass could have taken care of this in a manner several orders more believable than the 2006 killing of Alexander V. Litvinenko in which the uber rare, and thus strictly available to only government bodies, Polonium-210 was used.

They could have made it seem like a forlorn affair of unrequited love with that dancer-acrobat girlfriend of his.

It is acutely nonsensical to assume that movements of sensitive personnel, like Snowden, are not tracked, especially to far-flung locations like HK given that he is not a field operative of any kind.

The NSA and other assorted intelligence/military organizations probably have a protocol for dealing with these things,in conjunction with the Justice department.

If they didn't before, Manning's case would have elicited the need for one.

Source:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/world/europe/03russian.htm...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinen...

http://nation.time.com/2012/09/25/comparing-defense-budgets-...

http://www.forensicmag.com/articles/2009/06/polonium-210-and...

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mbvd/this-might-be-the-girlfriend-ed...

4 comments

Your suggestions are far too cute, actually. By going public, and periodically reminding everyone that he could be targeted for assassination, Snowden has created a strong incentive for FedGov to keep him very much alive.
I was referring to the fact that had they wanted they could have scuttled his efforts even before he arranged to speak to Greenwald and Poitras.

If the NSA or BAH were to submit that they were unaware of Snowden's whereabouts or movements when he arranged these interviews, they would in all likeliness be resorting to feigning ignorance.

It's the height of silliness to suggest they were clueless about Snowden's motives before his junket began.

Source:

http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/qa_with_laura_poitras_the_wo...

You seem to forget that, as has been proved,especially when it comes to government contractors, the US intelligence agencies are hilariously inefficient at what they do. That is what makes this sentence so funny: "For a nation that outspends the next ten defense budgets combined (even with the off late sequestration cuts accounted for) this is not much of a task."

Stop with the U.S. god complex already.

They want him extradited, they don't want him killed so I'm not sure how the rest of your comment about a different government's actions is relevant.
Cool story bro