[chaz]

That's ok. There's enough value in elevating the awareness that these things change frequently and providing a change record for those interested in a specific article, that providing a neater/cleaner way of conveying the changes is forgiven. Anyone can figure out how to read the diffs once they sit down to do it, and it still requires a human to interpret the value of changes. A single word can simply be a correction or it can be a complete reversal.

If a better UI is developed later on, it can be retrofitted.

[bliker]

I agree, in this case MVP is very good strategy. But I was more interested in technical side. Making it more readable is always a good target to have.