|
|
|
|
|
by chewxy
4749 days ago
|
|
This ethical question is particularly interesting. Just to play Devil's Advocate, let's assume that Big Pharma is not involved. Rather, the people who are doing the research are honest researchers who gain utility through the act of research and finding breakthroughs. If phrased this way, the incidents may suddenly now be sympathized as being yet another statistic - after all, sacrifices must be made in the name of scientific progress. The matter of coercion becomes trivial in the sense of The Greater Good (of course, not all research will yield positive results, and that's the whole point of research). Now, if one were to have this sort of view going into doing medical trials, who's to say that one's wrong? Why is it still evil, if the net result are better drugs to control one's moods? |
|
This guy's mother was giving the researchers feedback that the participant could not. Namely, that he was getting WORSE. She tried to have him removed from the program, and apparently couldn't. That goes well beyond "yet another statistic", especially as he was deemed incapable of making his own medical decisions.