[GeneralMayhem]

A bigger problem is the "he's a terrorist" issue - if there are not severe and well-defined repercussions for using a filter with false positives, and an active watchdog enforcing them, what's to stop, for example, anonnews from suddenly finding itself declared as pornography?

Once one thing is censored, you may as well consider everything else already censored as well not just as a slippery slope but as a fact, because anything else they want censored will just mysteriously get pushed into the same pile.