|
|
|
|
|
by gus_massa
4755 days ago
|
|
I've just tried it with: I tried it on some decent-looking HN comments. I am impressed that every "problem" it has found has been plausible, but disappointed that all have been wrong. This checker has one hell of a false positive rate. No errors / suggestions. I didn't get any feedback that the text has been analyzed and is ok. (I tried it with the original text and got some suggestions. It's working.) |
|