|
|
|
|
|
by gridmaths
4752 days ago
|
|
I too was shocked.. David Brooks took some weird slant on the guy not reflecting well before taking action, and betraying his family yadda yadda. Basically a character assassination, rather than looking at the issue. I think its pretty obvious the material was filtered pretty well..theres basically no hard facts there, bare minimum to support the claim. Which I think is responsible whistle-blowing. |
|
Another typical example: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/opinion/brooks-the-followe...