[skore]

> I can rebut Assange's points on their own merits, but I choose not to

Yes. Instead, you chose an ad hominem attack, which is pretty much the definition of feeding the trolls.

> Is this ad hominem reasoning? Sure, but ad hominem reasoning isn't necessarily bad.

No, ad hominem reasoning is simply meritless. The opposite of engaging in a discussion is remaining silent, not scoffing and walking off stage.

[ktd]

>Yes. Instead, you chose an ad hominem attack, which is pretty much the definition of feeding the trolls.

Are you really claiming that saying "don't feed the trolls" is feeding the trolls?

[skore]

And where did I say that?