|
|
|
Ask HN: Do you build tools whose end user is just you?
|
|
2 points
by bluepanda_
4755 days ago
|
|
Is it worth spending a considerable amount of time implementing a tool that meets the very specific requirements that you need, but which, as a result, may leave you as the single end user of the product? Or do you just, in this case, use tools that have already been developed, even though they don't meet the exact requirements that you need? Obvious advantages of developing such a tool are that the resulting product is just what you need, and it can therefore radically boosts your productivity. Another advantage is the experience you gained developing it. Disadvantages are that it only benefits you, and you cannot make any money from it or help other users. |
|
The most notable example for us is FUCIT - Fogbeam Universal Competitive Intelligence Tool. As you might guess, it's our dashboard for locating, exploring, cataloging, and analyzing competitive intelligence. There really wasn't anything out there that met the required combination of: features, functionality, price, license, technology stack, etc. So I cobbled FUCIT together as a Grails app over a week or two.
I don't really think we'll every try to make a product out of it, and since the code itself isn't really a source of competitive advantage, I am leaning towards open sourcing it eventually. I'd do it now, but A. I want to fix a few bugs and tweak a few more things first, and B. it just isn't a priority. But if we do ever release it, at least maybe somebody else will get some value from it, and maybe some other people will get involved in helping maintain / improve it over time.