[JamisonM]

I did not say that all Muslims always integrate nor did I mean to imply it. You post original post makes broadly general statements about all the Muslims in the world, it says in fact that they "won't integrate". It seems to me that the burden of proof is on you with all these generalities.

Which terrorists was I defending? If I offer a defence of Catholics against accusations of violence does that make me an IRA supporter or defender?

I want to hear more about the cabal of Muslims running South Africa, it sounds fascinating!

[white_devil]

> it says in fact that they "won't integrate". It seems to me that the burden of proof is on you with all these generalities

Look no further than the recent events in Stockholm. This guy might be a bit extreme, but he does have a point.

[maeon3]

I make broad sweeping generalizations about Muslim Extremists. Yes. By definition they are the ones that refuse to integrate and have on average 8 children per slave female and make it illegal to educate women.

Oh you're going for the "Islamic Takeovers of the world are OK because the Catholics did it too"? What the catholics did were wrong, and what the Extremist Muslims are doing is wrong too. Stop trying to apologize for the Extremist Muslims.

Blowing up children at Marathons to illustrate your hate of western values in the name of Allah is a BAD thing. Even if evil things were committed in the past, it was not OK then, and it's not OK now either. Can you at least acknowledge this much? Or should I expect another misdirection and fallacy?

[JamisonM]

Extremist Muslims are bad. Terrorists are bad. I do not support terrorism, Islamic or otherwise.

What you think you are writing and what you are actually writing appear to be two different things. You should work on that.