[rohshall]

I completely agree with you. I live in SG too and I love the government for all their efficiency, clean corruption-free, intellectual approach to managing the country, but hate it when they still have draconian measures like this to control the criticism. I find them stupid in this case, because most Singaporeans are happy with PAP and they will elect them anyway even if criticism is allowed.

[tellarin]

I have lived in Singapore and still have many friends there. That's one of the main reasons for me to submit this article.

I really liked the place, but for the complete control on media by the government and for this kind of measures to both stop criticism and "assure a peaceful society".

I'm really not sure if PAP would have the support it does if people could freely criticize it.

Another interesting related effect has also to do with how Singaporeans see themselves in relation to creativity and spontaneity due to the way things are structured there.

[ValentineC]

> I'm really not sure if PAP would have the support it does if people could freely criticize it.

From another perspective, I think it is a harmful anti-democratic cycle that the PAP has enough voting power in Parliament to effectively amend the Singapore constitution without debate [1], and to implement regulations such as this without opening it up to prior public debate.

Other forms of democracy have their shortfalls as well. First-past-the-post, at least in my opinion, needs to be replaced.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Singapore#Amend...

[donaq]

I'm really not sure if PAP would have the support it does if people could freely criticize it.

Hence the new law.

Another interesting related effect has also to do with how Singaporeans see themselves in relation to creativity and spontaneity due to the way things are structured there.

Possible sample bias here, but a lot of the creative types I know plan to leave.