Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by csoghoian 4762 days ago
Cody, on his own blog, described the sale of the vulnerability as follows:

In 2010, we (the startup I was running with friends at the time, UPM) decided to license the opening technology to a locksmithing company for law enforcement purposes.

If it is "laughable to suggest that Cody in any way enabled the USG to break into hotel rooms", then why would he describe the sale as "for law enforcement purposes"?

1 comments

I stand by everything I said in my previous comment while noting that you didn't respond to the main point of that comment or the one that preceded with it.