|
|
|
|
|
|
by wmf
4770 days ago
|
|
|
There has to be a line between acceptable risk and throwing good money after bad. I suspect Double Fine is on the right side of the line in this case, but if we let "it's $20 dude" excuse everything then we're opening ourselves up to outright fraud (as another poster said). So I think it'd good to question cases like these. |
|
|