|
|
|
|
|
|
by Terretta
4761 days ago
|
|
|
The photo quality would be rejected at some stock sites not just thanks to this severe chromatic aberration (try a better lens?) but also the excessive post processing causing contrast fringing, etc. These cannot be used in commercial print for discerning customers. I've found great results on Flickr with a Creative Commons search, and buying stock photos for commercial work is a tiny part of a print piece budget. |
|
|
Yeah, I'm not sure that's his target market. Most of the people who would use his images probably don't even know what CA is or how to spot it -- they just care about "free".
I imagine that more serious image hunters would stick with the big stock agencies.