|
|
|
|
|
by orclev
4775 days ago
|
|
It's still arguing for special privilege.
"and a line would form"... so?
"It's not that only men can ride it, it's that it's already full men, which is the current situation. Most people trying to get jobs in the technology area are men."
I'm not seeing anything here that changes that situation, merely provides a "free pass" to the few women who are interested in technology. This is just affirmative action applied to sexism. Point 1, is the only legitimate issue I see here, but I'm not seeing any suggestions on how to fix it, and no, handing someone a free pass just because they happen to be the right sex or race isn't the answer, it's just as bad as the problem it's supposed to be addressing. |
|
As a straight white male, I've already received a number of unearned bonuses. If I fail to receive another dose of privilege, that is definitely not as bad as somebody who's been unfairly penalized receiving another penalty.
Even in the case where I'm improperly penalized so as to give a bonus to somebody who has less privilege, I don't think that's as bad as the reverse. I've still got my lifetime history of privilege; although it feels locally unfair to me, I don't think it's globally unfair.