|
|
|
|
|
by carbocation
4767 days ago
|
|
1. FERPA information can be released in a "health" or "safety" emergency. 2. Records created by a designated official for the purpose of referring violations to police are not subject to FERPA. 3. Institutions have relatively broad power to designate people as school officials with legitimate educational interests, and thereby to designate who may receive FERPA-protected records. Some sources recommend to schools that they designate police or security personnel as "school officials with legitimate educational interests" for this reason [a]. a = http://www.campussafetymagazine.com/Channel/University-Secur... |
|
1. FERPA information can be released in a "health" or "safety" emergency, but only for the immediate duration of the emergency, and only to "appropriate parties." Moreover, FERPA has a specific carve out for disclosing student health records to parents in the case of drug or alcohol abuse. Read together, the provision can be interpreted to imply that drug use is by itself not a "health" or "safety" "emergency" because otherwise the specific carve-out would be superfluous and statutes are interpreted to avoid making any parts superfluous.
2. Right, but this survey was created for the express purpose of evaluating student psychological health, not for referring violations to police.
3. The same advice notes that police with access to private student information can only disclose that information pursuant to FERPA. Moreover, in the case law there is an emphasis on keeping the separate "hats" of student resource officers separate.