|
> Pythons guiding philosophy behind the syntax Python's syntax philosophy in a nutshell: The more your program looks like line noise, the harder it is to read. Operators should be simple and minimal, operations like list comprehension should match existing usage in English, mathematics, or C. > ruby was just a lot better Here's a Ruby snippet. I don't want to pick on this particular project [1], rather, I've found that this is typical of Ruby code: state_machine :state, initial: :active do
after_transition any => :blocked do |user, transition|
# Remove user from all projects and
user.users_projects.find_each do |membership|
return false unless membership.destroy
end
end
Wow. There are colons, absolute value bars, implications, and who-knows-what-else flying everywhere! It gets worse, elsewhere in the same file there are messy lines like this one with single-arrow implications, question marks and ampersands [2]: scope :not_in_project, ->(project) { project.users.present? ? where("id not in (:ids)", ids: project.users.map(&:id) ) : scoped }
Simple, intuitive syntax? From where I sit, the syntax of Ruby is worse than C++, and approaches Perl levels of awfulness.In most languages, I can at least sort-of grok what's going on from the context when I see unfamiliar operators, but not so in Ruby. [1] https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/blob/4caaea824cf51670d1... [2] https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/blob/4caaea824cf51670d1... |