|
|
|
|
|
by wpietri
4775 days ago
|
|
Sure, and I am saying it takes a lot more work to write that up well than to have a conversation. I guess it could be that people were answering those things in an entirely dull way. In which case, no wonder the meeting was seen as worthless. I'd suggest putting the boring information in a shared artifact. Personally, I tend to use as physical board. I also see virtual teams using a virtual board (like Trello) for that. The value of the stand-up is in what people say that goes beyond the obvious. |
|
I agree. I just don't necessarily think that you need that level of interaction for a status meeting every day. OK, maybe some teams do.. and I can see why some people might prefer it. But my experience has been that it's overkill.
That said, different teams, different cultures, different situations, could definitely dictate different approaches.
My biggest gripe with the daily meetings is that they force a context switch that somehow seems to always come at the most awkward possible time, no matter when you schedule the meeting. Requiring lots of face-to-face meetings also runs counter to the idea of having distributed teams and a lot of "work remotely" flexibility, which I also tend to favor.
But, again, YMMV.