[seivan]

I think you lack reading comprehension.

I did not say George Orwell was behind the concept stated.

I did not agree with the solution/suggestion presented by the Singaporean government.

I said the hate-mongering articles/rumours posted by these sites for ad-money _IS A PROBLEM_ that can easily be handled by refuting their bs with proof and transparency.

Seriously, reading comprehension. Though I do think my sentences were poorly structured, it did not say what you you seem to think it said.

[mseebach]

No, my reading comprehension is fine. You explicitly endorsed the measure and write not a single word that could be construed to refer to "proof and transparency".

EDIT this response was submitted before "Though I do think my sentences were poorly structured, it did not say what you you seem to think it said." was added.

[seivan]

"- they open up to more transparency and would somehow counter most of the bs articles."

Again, it's poorly structured, but not as poorly as missing the entire word "transparency"