[hispanic]

Wow, that's harsh. This is the part of the article that speaks to why I submitted it to HN:

"He says science, not religion, resurrected the afterlife. Advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation meant that patients who would have died were revived, and many had stories to share."

Regardless, I don't see why you consider it a "garbage article". It seems well-written to me.

[mhofstadt]

Everyone is free to believe anything they want, but mixing "science" into this article is rather degrading to genuine scientific inquiry. This is an article with an agenda, and that agenda is selling a book to believers. You can find a more appropriate platform to post this on.