|
|
|
|
|
by tptacek
6266 days ago
|
|
It shouldn't take a single stupid mistake to turn a string copy into a passwordless remote software update mechanism. $3+Bn USD of "shouldn't", down the drain. Can we talk about the real world, now? The reason Microsoft is driving modern offensive computing researchers nuts isn't that they got rid of the "stupid errors"; it's that they figured out how to make the runtime mitigate those errors with ASLR, NX, safe exceptions, and checked heaps. In the real world --- and I am speaking from bitter and recent experience with very, very, very smart clients here --- you should assume you are going to make stupid mistakes, and do everything you can reasonably do to keep those mistakes from totally screwing over your customers. |
|
I guess you could go after the OS or the web server, but I was under the impression you were talking about stupid mistakes from the web developer, not the developers of the OS or web server.