| The discussion here demonstrates the problem. So lets take a moment and think about what we see vs what we do. So if you take the Internet and extend it to its logical next step we've got 20 - 40gbits of bandwidth between everyone and everyone else. We've got parallel rendering pipelines and physics simulation such that you can render a scene that is indistinguishable from reality to our poor brains, and then you can project all the moving pieces between any group of people. So in a plausible future everyone is sitting inside a brain jar experiencing a 'shared world' in what is not unlike a giant World of Warcraft type experience, including the ability to do magic, conjure things out of thin air. While nutrients feed what's left of our bodies. Is that exciting? Does that make for dramatic movies? No. But sadly it is the current path we are on. |
That leads to plenty of interesting Asimov like thinking, except instead of AI and Robot, it would be us vs virtual us.
Also what happens with buffer copies, backup. How do you define being human at all ? Or even more basically the very concept of time become weird.
It is not necessary that a virtualised human would not have access to the external world. Maybe you can upload yourself, control animal, why not culturing special type of synthetic bodies for recreation ?
To me that does not look so bad at all, and there is definitively non-boring science-fiction material in there.