|
|
|
|
|
by Steko
4782 days ago
|
|
"In Steve's world, Apple's raising the price by 30% and then taking 30% is a benefit to the customer and not Apple" The price was already $12.99. The fact that Amazon was willing to eat a large amount of that price on a tiny volume of ebooks in the short term doesn't mean that would have favored consumers in the long term. Today, with agency pricing, the average price of an ebook is around $8. Hasn't that benefited consumers? |
|
Thanks to the settlement, Amazon can now [again] charge what it would like and the result was an immediate drop for titles by publishers that settled. Consumers were hurt by Apple and have benefited from the DOJ's case against Apple's business practices.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/80961.html
> The settlement approved Thursday requires the publishers not only to kill their contracts with Apple within a week but also to end contracts with any e-book retailers that specifically place restrictions on a retailer’s ability to set prices on e-books. And the settlement also bars the publishers from granting a retailer “most favored nation” status for five years.
And: http://www.mhpbooks.com/amazon-begins-discounting-macmillan-...