|
|
|
|
|
by npc
4774 days ago
|
|
1. No one ever said that only women are faced with high performance demands, you're very obviously making a strawman and you should feel bad for it. 2. Arguments like "This is a very common argument and it is false" and "it is simply not true that..." are merely bald assertions of fact and would not be convincing even if you were arguing against an opinion that someone actually held 3. "Many or even all men can feel this same expectation in performance-based professions, but they will not blame their sex" is dog whistling for the idea that women are somehow conspiring to use anti-sexism to apologize for poor performance. Also, how you can claim to know the feelings of "many or even all men", and compare them to the feelings of women is beyond me. 4. I have never seen a man complain about sexism in tech, but many women have. There are only three explanations:
a) women in tech are somehow unreasonably seeing sexism where there is none, which given that it happens to numerous women but no men requires an explanation that isn't cheap handwaving
b) women in tech are trying to use complaints of sexism to get ahead unfairly, which I will happily dismiss as being needlessly cynical and misogynist
c) there is sexism in tech, which given that sexism exists to some degree in most every place is not an unreasonable thing to think 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_threat might be a good read |
|