|
|
|
|
|
by recoiledsnake
4785 days ago
|
|
>I don't know if that's a valid extrapolation. I, for one, in all my working years have never met a Linux company that was interested in switching to .NET, but I met many that wanted it the other way around if they could only justify the upfront investment to convert the proprietary application stack. Thanks for doing exactly what the OP requested commenters NOT to do. From the OP post: "Does anyone have real data related to ".NET is dying" other than idle conjecture, short sighted "frog in the well" anectodes which sound like they're written and voted up by people sipping on a latte on a Macbook in a Starbucks in Silicon Valley? Again, any hard data will be appreciated that shows .NET is dying instead of the same paragraph upon paragraph of opinion and no links, references or data, we have enough HN comments of that already." The world is much much much bigger than what you saw in all your working years. That's why personal anecdotes are quite worthless and we need real numbers. So many paragraphs of speculation and no links or references from people living in their own little bubble and mistaking it for the world. |
|
I countered jussij's perspective, equally posted without "links or references" (which don't necessarily make something valid, fyi), with my own. I didn't reply to the parent post that said "please don't say anything mean about .NET unless you can prove it". That poster is not the internet police, we are free to continue to speculate and navel-gaze and counter-navel-gaze despite his or her statement.
So, you're welcome.