|
|
|
|
|
by jdoliner
4785 days ago
|
|
I think the key question then is why it was that 4.8 more seats were filled on average per flight. If we had data the showed that the distribution of plane occupancy were the same year over year save for a few occasions where last year the plane had been at capacity but this year those extra 6 seats had been put to use then the conclusion could be valid. However with the data I've seen so far it seems spurious to conclude that the extra 4.8 filled seats were caused by the extra 6 physical seats. |
|
$100 for first 50% of capacity
$120 for next 20%
$170 for next 20%
$300 for next 5%
$600 for final 5%
What is the revenue impact of expanding capacity? The solution is not obvious, but the author's approximation is more accuare than you suggest. You obviously can't solve this without a stochastic ticket demand model, but 4.8 is much closer to the right answer than 0.