Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bane 4783 days ago
> You're more optimistic than I am if you think that a government committee will be democratic, or that such a committee (democratic or not) would base its decisions on clinical considerations, or that people would not be outraged at rational clinical decisions.

As opposed to the democratic decision that's already being made in board rooms?

1 comments

It doesn't have to be democratic because it's not using the public's money.
oh I see, so long as people are killed by private money it's cool.
Oh, so as long as people are "killed" democratically it's cool.

Nobody's killing anybody. People die. It happens. Maybe someday I will have a heart attack. On that day, I'm not going to rob somebody at gunpoint and demand they give me $33k. Equivalently, I'm not going to have the government threaten fellow citizens with jail time and garnished wages if they don't pay their taxes to pay for my treatment. And I'd appreciate it if they'd extend me the same respect.

You know what? You're right. Fuck it. People die. Let's not even bother. Let's cut out the police department, the military...even if you did have the money, why bother? You're just going to die.

Why bother eating right or exercising? Fuck, why not just off ourselves and save all the hassle.

There's absolutely no difference amongst the different kinds of things people can die from, especially ones that are easy to fix and ones that we can't do anything about.

There's absolutely no difference amongst the different kinds of things people can die from, especially ones that are easy to fix and ones that we can't do anything about.

Hey, we actually came back to the point, kinda! There's a lot of things you can die from that fall in between "easy to fix" and "can't do anything about it". Where you draw the "fuck it, people die" line is hugely variable between different people, and it's not something you'll find a shred of consensus on across the 300,000,000 people in the USA. It's better for people to negotiate coverage with individual hospitals (and voluntary charities) than to have standards of care dictated by a central authority.

apparently it's provably not since countries with a strong centrally controlled health care system seem to be providing superior health care vs systems that let people do what you propose