Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by avenueb 4795 days ago
I took one look at how iPhoto stores the pictures years ago and said "no way" (same with storing my music in iTunes). My SMB network share has been working quite well for me, connect all my Windows and Mac computers and my Android phone and tablets to my share.. backed up to another USB drive. Has been working well for over a decade for me. iTunes and iPhoto are primary reasons I don't do Apple products.
2 comments

How iPhoto stored photos years ago and now are very different. Today iPhoto uses the scalable Aperture library SQLite DB for fast indexing and searching (open same library in both programs), but stores photos in simple directory structure (folders dated by import date) as original untouched files.
Yeah, I had the same heartburn with iphoto years ago. I was still in the mindset of wanting to do file management myself. Now I'm buying in to the principle of letting the app manage the files in a DB. Or just generally taking file management away from user, but no one has really cracked the nut of how to that across multiple services and multiple devices.
You really do have to get over that psychological block about managing files to enjoy using iPhoto and Aperture.

Personally, I don't mind it, because it's one less thing to think about. I would prefer to buy a bigger drive than to worry about the placement of my photo files beyond the iPhoto/Aperture library package.

On the other hand, I know people with that file management mentality that hate, hate, hate iPhoto and Aperture's way of doing things.