[beachstartup]

so in other words no M5, no alpina B7, no E63. probably no Caddilac V, no LS7 ZR1, no Audi RS either. in other words, you have no idea about other cars in the Sperf's class, just some bullshit cheapie base-model cars that are about $30k cheaper. but you are a tech dude with money who likes the idea of electric vehicles, so you like the Sperf, because it APPEALS TO YOU. and there's nothing wrong with that.

"instant" torque is cool and all, but no match for "more" torque. which also happens to be "instant" when you move beyond a cheapass 3-series M or base 911 with no balls (try a GT2, when you start wearing big boy pants) or V10 in that price range.

[dave1619]

I've driven a 911S which I'd say is a pretty respectable car. I've driven also supercharged M3s as well. But you're right, I haven't driven those other cars and I'm not making a judgement call on them.

All I'm saying is that in my opinion based on driving the cars is that I prefer the Model S Performance over the supercharged M3, 911S because of superior handling, torque and feel.

Just my two cents, no need to get offended that a battery car can give a decent ride.

Also, I know there are people who have traded in the M5's for a Model S Performance and have been quite happy.

[beachstartup]

decent ride, but i'm not rich. when i spend 100k it's a serious expenditure, and i want the best in class.

maybe for bay area millionaires automotive performance is less important than social progressivism when you drop 100k but not for me.

[wr1472]

talk about a passive aggressive tone.