|
|
|
|
|
by jacques_chester
4796 days ago
|
|
So we're back to a boundary argument, again. Partisans will draw the boundaries as it suits their argument. Though, I do need to emphasise a point: > subsets of the transaction Each step in moving the information from the ATM to the General Ledger is itself a transaction. There are no "subsets of a transaction". If it's divisible, then it's not a transaction (this is the atomicity requirement of ACID). |
|
We see this pattern all over the place. The primary example is any place that accepts checks as payment. Availability is immediate, but consistency is not necessarily there.
You see it with a business making a PO. Lots of places will still take credit cards which are only processed daily (ok, this is becoming rare where there is cell service.)