|
|
|
|
|
|
by jongraehl
4793 days ago
|
|
|
1. this could be done offline, or cached 2. unconvinced that they can't do better w/ the right hash table (which will be thousands of lines fewer of code). but since they're using a library, i'll give them a pass. not even a benchmark vs. a quick hash table version makes all the claims about "judy arrays are better for our purpose" suspect. |
|
|