|
|
|
|
|
|
by happy_dino
4791 days ago
|
|
|
Trying to have a small language sometimes results in allowing (or having to allow it in the sense of not outlawing it) multiple ways to do the same thing, especially as the expressiveness increases. As an example, I don't think Python's “there's only one way to do it”-approach would have a chance of surviving if the language was as expressive as Scala. In the end, as long as Scala stays simpler than Java 8 and vastly simpler than F#, C# and C++, it's good enough for me. |
|
|