[pseudonym]

I think people are more oblivious to the fact that a "deflationary currency" is inherently flawed because it by definition results in hoarding, which is not what you want people to do with your currency. Why would you bother loaning or investing it if you can make more money just sitting on it?

[fleitz]

If USD was limited to currency in circulation then it would not be nearly as inflationary as it is.

Once an established lending system based on bitcoins is established it will have the same problems as our current currencies. It wasn't printing money that caused the real estate bubble, it was the way to banking system has the power to expand credit and the systemic risk that expansion of credit causes.

Once there are fractional reserve bitcoin banks it will no longer be a deflationary currency.

[wintersFright]

Will people want to borrow in defalationary biased currency though? Better to borrow in Bernanke Bucks where there is an unstoppable torrent being emitted monthly.

IMHO the Real estate bubble was from the Fed bailing the prior tech bubble by suppressing interest rates - which encourages borrowing. When loans are paid back, the currency created by taking the loan is extinguished but they have been juicing the system by continually suppressing rates via QE/bond purchases and not letting the real market decide the risk (ie: price of bonds). Now that interest rates have hit the floor - the next bubble to pop is the USD itself.

[fleitz]

If the USD pops then BTC may be less deflationary. The bubble did not pop because mortgages were paid back.

Loans are generally repaid in currency, paying back a loan creates even more currency as the additional currency created by the interest becomes an asset against which loans can be issued.

[XorNot]

The idea the USD is going to collapse is farcical. It would be a global catastrophe of a scale not yet seen, but also not threatened.

Meanwhile, BTC gains and loses 50 - 80% of its value in a single day. I wonder which is more stable.

[dualogy]

> It would be a global catastrophe of a scale not yet seen, but also not threatened

It would have been in the 70s -- which is why USD support has remained despite the Nixon shock for a few more decades. By now, most central banks and governments are increasingly, dare I say "prepared" or slowly preparing for the possibility without it impacting their economies or trade too badly. Nobody wants to see the USD fail or die --- but day-to-day economic / monetary policies on US soil should become less and less of a rest-of-the-world economic worry, concern or impact compared to previously.

Now, the last remaining problem is savings of millions tied up in USD promises worldwide. Still a big problem, and rest assured the USD will continue to get "support" to the proportion that these savings haven't "migrated" over to "something else" yet.

Anyway, one day all these notes the US has been "exporting" globally for many years will come home one way or the other. Hope the new cash supplies won't, ahem, "overwhelm" a struggling domestic economy at that time, shall we?

[XorNot]

"One day". It will be a gradual process - it has to be - because anyone stupid enough to try and cash-out mass USD in bulk will not get there money's worth back in it.

But more importantly, is there any real sign that that time is soon? Global financial crisis...and the world's investors are literally paying the US to take their money with the current returns on US treasuries.

But it's hardly the USD "collapsing" - it's a gradual process over time, which crucially doesn't effect the buying power of individuals over meaningful timespans to them (decades, not days - unlike BTC).

And, probably more importantly, whatever replacement reserve currency comes to the fore (and what would it be, exactly?), it won't be something like BTC.

[wintersFright]

Agree BTC is way too unstable but being the the best nag in the glue factory doesn't mean much.

USD collapse would certainly be a far reaching global event but that doesn't mean it will not happen. I'm sure all prior entities with reserve status also thought their position unasailable.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/im...

Global support for it is waning. China is doing direct currency swap deals and is no longer supporting USD by stacking treasuries at the rate it was. Russia is dishoarding treasuries too. The current trade deficit is propped up by the Fed buying USG bonds and suppressing interest rates. USD is not long for this world in its current form.

[XorNot]

Plenty of currencies exist without being de facto global currencies and survive just fine. The question is what makes the USD likely to collapse as a currency altogether - rather then simply behave more like the normal internal currency of a sovereign nation?

People don't go around predicting the decline and fall of the Australian dollar for example.

[jacquesm]

> The idea the USD is going to collapse is farcical. It would be a global catastrophe of a scale not yet seen, but also not threatened.

In the short term you are probably right. In the long term you are almost certainly wrong.

[XorNot]

Hardly. What long term destabilizing factors would make people abandon the USD - the currency of the current global military hegemon, if nothing else?

[wintersFright]

I see your point - the principal is repaid but the interest stays in circulation.

Agree mortgages didn't pop due to being paid back.

[zurn]

Deflation is not desireable in itself, but it is not a crippling disadvantage. Eg Japan has had a very long deflation spiral and it didn't affect the usability of their currency. And the west has been living in a world of negative real interest rates since the 2008 crisis.

As long as we don't have a big bitcoin credit market and we don't want to regulate the bitcoin "printing press" to adjust for market cycles, it won't even be a disadvantage. = As long as it's only a secondary currency to most users.