[tptacek]

Please read the bill, not just EFF's summary of the bill. To be covered under CISPA, the information must be stored or transmitted on a protected system, and whatever the violation is, it can't be either a consumer terms of service agreement or a consumer licensing agreement.

Additionally, published content isn't confidential.

[D9u]

...published content isn't confidential.

Unless you happen to increment a public-facing URL in a numeric fashion...

[diminoten]

No, that wouldn't do it.

There are just easier ways to string someone up for copyright infringement if you really wanted to than CISPA.

[u2328]

I've read the bill, but I'm not a lawyer, so maybe I misunderstood.

Could you please point out the text of the bill that you're describing here?