The fact that it is obvious was exactly my point and the reason I was dismissive of that part of the article, so not only have you missed what I was commenting about, you've also acted like a bit of a dick in doing so. Not really necessary.
No, but he (in the article) was trying to make the argument that it is better financially to not by drugs because of Bitcoin rising in value, my point was that this is generally true regardless of whether Bitcoin is involved.