[grimtrigger]

Too bad its NSFW. One of those things I'd love to forward around.

Overall, awesome concept.

[jiggy2011]

It's got a few naked breasts in it, and they are mostly covered with mouse pointers now.

Are many people legitimately shocked by that sort of content in 2013?

[DanBC]

Facebook remove images of breast even if they are mothers breast-feeding infants.

Youtube doesn't allow breasts.

A US TV outrage happened because of one partially uncovered breast during a sport event.

Yes, some people are shocked by that sort of content. Legitimate is secondary; if they own the computers you're using and they have power to dismiss you it's a good idea to think of their reasonable requests as legitimate.

[jiggy2011]

Sounds like a US centric thing then, most countries in europe AFAIK will allow breasts to be shown in prime time TV as long as the context is not overtly sexual.

Edit: I've definitely seen breasts on youtube

[elliottcarlson]

Youtube allows breasts and nudity when used as an art form - not in a pornographic sense.

[sliverstorm]

I guess your grandparents are pretty progressive, then?

[iso-8859-1]

> Too bad its NSFW.

Too bad it's not safe for your work place :) (maybe that was what you meant). I don't see any reason to sacrifice expression for prudes.

[looki]

That part takes like 5 seconds and other mouse pointers actually cover the... parts that make it NSFW.