|
|
|
|
|
|
by scott_meade
4817 days ago
|
|
|
Being "provoked to action" is not the same "making better decisions". The relevancy that the author is talking of is of things that you need to decide where the need to decide did not come from news. In other words, if you read no news you would still have many decisions to make, right? The question is - does news help you make better choices in those decisions? Said another way, how many decisions can you think of that:
1.) the need to make a choice did not arise from reading the news, and
2.) reading the news led to a better decision? The election is probably closest to these type of decisions. But I like Tim Ferriss's approach to discuss pros and cons of candidates with trusted friends instead of the press. |
|
|