|
|
|
|
|
by rdl
4812 days ago
|
|
Hawala or the equivalent makes MUCH more sense for moving money. BTC has neither the depth nor technical features to accomodate massive illegal flows. The problem with cross-border drug exchange is that at the retail level, you end up with a fuckton of $5-20 bills. You could color up to $100s in some cases, but even that is hard at scale. Dealing with bulk currency in the heavily surveilled customer nations (USA, EU) is hard. The gold standard seems to be shipping bulk currency out, since most drug people are already good at moving bulk products in. Trying to deposit it into If you had a way to spend infinite $5 bills in the US to buy BTC, you'd be just as likely to have a way to spend infinite $5 bills in the US to buy bank deposits in Macau. It's the first stage which is the serious problem, not stages 2/3. Pretty much all 3 stages of money laundering now happen outside the US -- or you bring washed money back into the US to invest in some cases, the last stage. Hawala works because you can net stuff out, thus reducing the need to move bulk currency. But you still need to move bulk currency eventually to settle up. |
|
Often in local news there are reports about small dealers getting busted, while they only have small quantities of drugs at home, if at all, most have shitloads of money in their homes - which breaks their neck in court.